Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Debra L Eder's avatar

This— “Here’s the most important reason I include people of all ages: I am trying to de-stigmatize and normalize the effects of aging by showing that it’s happening to everyone of every age, all the time…”.

Oldster is anti-ageist.

I’m on the other side of 60. By Including all ages, your publication makes me feel relevant!

Sarahkate Moore's avatar

I'm 71 and was laid off day 1 of my state's pandemic lockdowns - the only "oldster" surrounded by GenZ and ME-lennials and the only employee not given a remote work option. This despite in a decade of no work missed ever - compared with GenZ who were frequently absent while I picked up their neglected work assignments. What I see is a preponderance of online and print articles trying to convince "oldsters" that it's all in their heads and there's no such thing as ageism; that if one just engages in "positive thinking" they can overcome all microaggressions against "Oldsters." Just not true. Ageism is seriously engaged in, it is still widely practiced and fully accepted, but it is dangerous to all types of health from financial health to mental health and even physical health as many health care providers engage in ageism with every patient (esp. women patients) over 40. If I see more focus on DOING something about ageism instead of the victim blaming implied in "just change your mindset and you can live forever" then I will happily subscribe to those blogs and news outlets that actually tackle the problem instead of deflecting it against those who experience it daily.

171 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?